<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wyse with VDI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtualize.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/wyse-with-vdi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtualize.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/wyse-with-vdi/</link>
	<description>Experiences in Virtualization</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hannah Drake</title>
		<link>http://virtualize.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/wyse-with-vdi/#comment-1405</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualize.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/wyse-with-vdi/#comment-1405</guid>
		<description>Just a shout-out. Love your blog. The idea is great, and I'm sure it must be really useful to a lot of readers. We linked to you (and chatted you up) on our own blog: http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/

-Hannah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a shout-out. Love your blog. The idea is great, and I&#8217;m sure it must be really useful to a lot of readers. We linked to you (and chatted you up) on our own blog: <a href="http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/" rel="nofollow">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/</a></p>
<p>-Hannah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martijnl</title>
		<link>http://virtualize.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/wyse-with-vdi/#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator>martijnl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 22:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualize.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/wyse-with-vdi/#comment-1196</guid>
		<description>Hi Russ,

That possibility was shown in the demo. The Wyse rep explained it as the S10-VDI version having it's own broker within the firmware. I don't know if that is the correct description but we understood what the possibilities were.

Thanks for the reminder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Russ,</p>
<p>That possibility was shown in the demo. The Wyse rep explained it as the S10-VDI version having it&#8217;s own broker within the firmware. I don&#8217;t know if that is the correct description but we understood what the possibilities were.</p>
<p>Thanks for the reminder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://virtualize.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/wyse-with-vdi/#comment-1191</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualize.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/wyse-with-vdi/#comment-1191</guid>
		<description>Did you know you can make a connection without a connection broker using the Wyse S10 WTOS firmware?
Check with your local Wyse feild SE for more information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know you can make a connection without a connection broker using the Wyse S10 WTOS firmware?<br />
Check with your local Wyse feild SE for more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martijnl</title>
		<link>http://virtualize.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/wyse-with-vdi/#comment-1183</link>
		<dc:creator>martijnl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 01:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualize.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/wyse-with-vdi/#comment-1183</guid>
		<description>I don't know exactly which portion of the post you are referring to but using thin clients with VDI would leverage the already existing VDI platform without having to bring yet another software platform / supplier / knowledge area into the managing department (which is very lean with regards to staffing).

On the education PC side we are evaluating thin clients as a possible option next to keeping fat clients but with Virtual Desktops in stead of all the different software images or virtual machines (VMWare Player for example) for courses. Wyse also has an application streaming platform which we are also looking at and Ardence could be another option. 

To be completely honest I had never heard of Ardence before your post here so I will be checking out the website at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know exactly which portion of the post you are referring to but using thin clients with VDI would leverage the already existing VDI platform without having to bring yet another software platform / supplier / knowledge area into the managing department (which is very lean with regards to staffing).</p>
<p>On the education PC side we are evaluating thin clients as a possible option next to keeping fat clients but with Virtual Desktops in stead of all the different software images or virtual machines (VMWare Player for example) for courses. Wyse also has an application streaming platform which we are also looking at and Ardence could be another option. </p>
<p>To be completely honest I had never heard of Ardence before your post here so I will be checking out the website at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardence</title>
		<link>http://virtualize.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/wyse-with-vdi/#comment-1152</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualize.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/wyse-with-vdi/#comment-1152</guid>
		<description>Interested why you would use VDI to deliver this. It would seem that OS steaming like Ardence would give you everything you want, less infrastructure and full power at the desktop. While Ardence is very popular for streaming VDI desktops, in your case, using Ardence to the desktop would fufill all your needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interested why you would use VDI to deliver this. It would seem that OS steaming like Ardence would give you everything you want, less infrastructure and full power at the desktop. While Ardence is very popular for streaming VDI desktops, in your case, using Ardence to the desktop would fufill all your needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
